Saturday, May 26, 2012


By Schmoel Yitzhak

If Mitt Romney is serious about de-throning Barack Obama by winning the Jewish vote, the Republican candidate already has all the ammunition he needs.

Romney's starting gun should fire off with the President's sanctimonious comment at the last AIPAC convention that he has "Israel's back."

Obama merely re-defined hypocrisy with his duplicity-riddled statement. What's more, the facts are all there for Romney to clearly define and employ them in order to garner the Jewish votes. To wit:

* WHERE'S ISRAEL'S CAPITAL: Since the birth of the Middle East's only working democracy, Israel's capital has been Jerusalem. It's the Knesset's home, the Prime Minister's residence and the base of Israel's assorted governmental bureaus. 

Yet, the White House says, no, Israel's capital is -- there's a brief pause here for station identification -- well, Obama, Inc. isn't sure where it is. This dastardly revelation was underlined at a recent State Department news conference during which a reporter queried the Department's spokeswoman about Uncle Sam's stand on Jerusalem as capital of Israel. 

Repeated queries brought the same reply that Jerusalem's status still must be negotiated between Israel and Who Knows Who.

Negotiated. What is there to negotiate? The unalterable fact has been on the ground since David Ben Gurion established the Jewish State in 1948 and planted the capital's flag in Jerusalem; not Tel Aviv, not Haifa and not Eilat.

"Is Jerusalem or is it not Israel's capital?" the journalist finally demanded of the State Department lady. 

No, she would not acknowledge same and rudely halted the questioning with the comment, "I already told you (that it must be negotiated)."

Now you know and I know and Mitt Romney knows full well that Ms. State Department merely was articulating the position of her boss, Hillary Clinton, and the not-Jerusalem platform established for the Secretary of State by the president.

If, in fact, Obama has "Israel's back," he would unequivocally assert what we all acknowledge; that Jerusalem is the capital; no ifs, ands or buts. But you'll hear nothing of the kind from Pennsylvania Avenue because the Chief Executive does not recognize what every Israeli -- and American Jews -- do; that the country's government is in Jerusalem. 

Therefore, why would any Israeli-loving American Jew vote for someone who won't support Israel on a clear-cut issue?

* THE IRANIAN THREAT: Where is Obama when Israel is threatened with extinction by Iran? The madman Ahmadinejad continually reiterates his kill-the-Jews position and just last week one of Iran's top generals unequivocally stated that Iran is "committed to Israel's annihilation." 

No matter how you shake it, those are more than fighting words, they have overtones of  an Iranian second Holocaust policy now espoused by the chief of staff of the iranian armed forces. 

Now if Uncle Sam's chief executive really had "Israel's back," he would have unequivocally denounced Ahmadinejad and his top general in the strongest possible terms while supporting an Israeli strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. 

Of course not a peep has been heard from the White House and for good reason; Obama has been kow-towing to the ayotollahs despite their continuous -- and meaningful -- threats against Israel. Ahmadinejad laughs at the "sanctions," knowing full well that they will not halt his country's move toward nuclear domination of the Middle East.

Experts in the field such as Jamie Fly, former advisor to the George W. Bush administration, and former Pentagon defense planner Matthew Koenig are clearly pointing out that interim agreements with the Iranians are worthless.

"On Iran," they recently wrote in the Washington Post, "Obama has dangled plenty of carrots. It's time to pull out some sticks. There's little reason to believe that Iran is serious about doing anything other than using the coming weeks to enrich more uranium and make progress toward a nuclear weapon."

Obama's only concern is the Autumn election and with that in mind, he will continue to stall and stall and stall until the votes are in whereupon he'll swing into his naive vision of nuclear reduction and global disarmament. That will include demands that Israel shut down its nuclear facilities. Jews in America and Israel should be aware that the president's long-term goal is to make nice to a Muslim world that hates America almost as much as it does the Jewish State.

Writing in IsraelHayom, columnist Dan Margalit accurately discerns what's behind the agreement that the International Atomic Energy Agency reached with Iran.

"At its core," Margalit correctly concludes, "the agreement is merely a goodwill gesture by the Iranians aimed at facilitating Obama's re-election in November."

And this Obama guy says he has "Israel's back." 

Mitt Romney, if you want the Jewish vote, the facts are there and cannot be denied by Hillary, her lackeys and certainly not the president who will repeatedly stab Israel -- front or back -- to win re-election!

Wednesday, May 23, 2012


By Simon Fischler 
It is time for Israel’s eighty percent Jewish majority to boycott Israeli Arabs, their towns and their businesses!
African Americans (and liberal-to-moderate whites) boycotted white-owned companies and businesses in Alabama and elsewhere in the American South during the Civil Rights movement. We Jewish Israelis must show Israel’s Arab population that their racist policies against the state that gives them the greatest freedom in the world will no longer come for free – by doing the same! 
After the actions of Arab Knesset Member Ahmed Tibi this week, there appears to be no other choice. Speaking of choice, MK Tibi’s congratulations to the South African government for its anti-Semitic, anti-Israel decision to label products made in Judea and Samaria “Not Made in Israel” is at the heart of this matter. 
Tibi’s action, made by an Israel Knesset member -- someone sworn to support Israel --is beyond unacceptable. There are countries – particularly Islamic ones – where his support of a boycott movement against his own country would be declared treason, with a death sentence attached.
And the bitter truth is that Tibi’s choice to congratulate and encourage policies pushed by a clearly anti-Israel, anti-Semitic organization, The Boycott, Divest and Sanction movement IS treason. Certainly it is a gross abuse of the democracy in which Tibi is allowed to function.
This treasonous behavior of Israel’s Arab population, which has become a pasttime of many, has become too much to accept, starting with the overwhelmingly racist and self-inflicted Nakba Day. 
Nakba is the day Arabs who live and flourish in Israel cry about the fact that their leaders did not succeed in committing national genocide against the Jewish population of Israel back in 1947-48.
On Nakba Day the Arabs cry, bemoaning the fact that they listened to those same leaders and evacuated their homes in the land that is now Israel. Worse, their leaders were unable to kill, rob, steal and displace the Jewish Nation from its homeland! 
So ALL Nakba Day consists of is the Arabs’ continued ability to deny historical fact and the truth of their own actions, instead blaming the State of Israel – in which they live and thrive and which is ALLOWING them to sit around and whine like this! 
Israel, albeit a democracy, has no room for perpetual scapegoating and denial like this or that you see in today’s Western society.
Today I call on all true Israelis who love their nation to BOYCOTT all Arab towns, Souks, stores and places of business – sending a clear message to both the Arabs of Israel and the disgusting, obscene BDS Movement. 
This is an enormous, difficult task, because Israel – completely unlike the apartheid BDS and others would have you think exists in Israel – is a largely mixed society. While the majority of Arabs choose to live in their own cities and towns, they also work and carry on businesses outside of their home communities. 
This can mean that the nurse in charge of the cardiac doctor’s office at Belanson Hospital in Petah Tikvah is an Arab. How does one “boycott” her? Should she lose her job because she is represented by a treasonous idiot? 
This can mean that the local convenience store open on Shabat is run by Arabs, and the favorite Saturday night restaurant is run by Lebanese, Turks, or Druse. Are they the “enemy” or are they fellow loyal citizens of Israel? Terribly difficult choices and decisions must be made – all because MK Tibi is unable to appreciate which side of his pita has the hummus on it!
Levity aside, somehow the Arabs of Israel must understand that they can no longer enjoy a free ride in Israel. If they behave in treasonous fashion, they must pay for it, financially as well as physically. 
The anti-Semites at BDS must be forced to understand that their racist actions against Israel will worsen the lives of Arabs who live in Israel 
It is time for Israel and its citizens to stand up and say we are NOT a “catastrophe.” In fact, we are THE CORRECTION of ARAB/EUROPEAN IMPERIALIST WRONGS AND CATASTROPHES committed again and again against the Jewish Nation, particularly since the inception of Islam.
Unlike the foreign, colonial Arabs, whose nation was not born in Israel, the Jewish Nation was born here. We the Jewish Nation have lived in Israel since long before Jesus, Mohammad or the Arabs ever existed here. 
The Jewish Nation has survived in Israel through Greek, Roman, Crusader, European and Arab colonial rule. We will never again surrender our self-determination.
If you refuse to accept the national rights of the Jewish Nation then you must PAY FOR IT!

Saturday, May 19, 2012


By Simon Fischler

Will we strike Iran?

Will we allow Iran to continue its objective, that is to pass the nuclear threshold and build a bomb?

Or is it, that we have already begun our strike? 

The only ones who can answer that are the former employees who were at the Osirak and Al Kibar nuclear reactors!  But they are not here today, nor can they speak today!

Why must the world insist on not learning that the Israeli sleeper has awoken? 

Why is it that the Arabs and Muslims fail to understand us? 

We are not going away, our key to the house of Israel existed long before they left Arabia!

We will not give up, nor will we allow another Holocaust to happen.

Ask Nashrallah, the spider web he promised ended up being a Lebanese one!

Tuesday, May 15, 2012


By Schmoel Yitzhak

Catherine Ashton is the European Union's pooh-bah when it comes to making major statements on the Middle East; but never a just peace pact that works.

In case you didn't know, Ashton also happens to be an English baroness -- for what that's worth -- and the highest-paid female politician in the world. And that's worth plenty!

You'd think that with all her alleged brains and all her non-alleged dough she'd have what was known in the old-old country as "saichel," or super-smarts.

And if Baroness Ashton was gifted with "saichel," she would understand that her favorite country, Great Britain, would be in deep trouble if neighboring Scotland on one side and Ireland on the other side and Wales on the third side decided to make major trouble for Merrie Olde England.

The filthy rich baroness would take a dim view at all that, esepcially if, say, the Irish armed themselves with enough rockets to blitz London once more, Nazi-style. 

Then again, the smirk would be wiped off her face if the Scots decided they didn't want to be pals with the descendants of John Bull anymore. You can bet that Catherine The Not-So-Great would be up in arms, waxing wroth as only a baroness can.

But when it comes to making peace in the Middle East, Ashton's political insight-foresight-hindsight could be generously recorded at 120-120-120 vision; otherwise known as astigmatic.

More specifically, in Israel's case, the baroness has one focus; she's fixated on Jews building homes. it doesn't matter whether they're putting up houses in East Jerusalem, West Jerusalem, Judea nor Samaria, this construction irks her no end. In fact, Ashton gets so hot and bothered about Jews building house that's all she appears to talk about it while excluding the genuine threats to peace. And that's where she should translate her imagination to reality.

Start with the latest threat from Lebanon where the ever-hiding Hassan Nasrallah publically boasts that his Hezbollah bandits now have enough rockets to bomb any part of Israel -- with special attention to Tel Aviv. 

The reason why this warning is real can be directly attributed to the United Nations inability to fulfill its role in demilitarizing Hezbollah in the wake of the Lebanese War. Then again when it comes to the UN -- check out Syria -- its impotence in curbing such violence is part of the world outfit's branding -- as useless.

In terms of Ashton, she should imagine the Lebanese threat in the same terms as the possibility of Scots shooting rockets at London. Then she should factor in the latest movement in Egypt to end its peace treaty with Israel. In a recent debate Egyptian presidential hopefuls Amr Moussa and Abdel Moneim Abol Fotouh said that Israel is an adversary and an enemy. A recent poll reveals that a majority of Egyptians feel that way.

How would Baroness Ashton feel if Irish politicians decided to go to war with England; with substantial popular support for that in Eire?

And what if France -- copying the Iranian leaders -- threatened to wipe out Great Britain as soon as the French fully developed nuclear weapons? 

In those threatening circumstances, I seriously doubt whether the European Union's high commissioner would be wringing her hands in distress over some homes being built by the French in neighboring Belgium or Luxembourg.

Say this for Baroness Ashton, she has friends when it comes to irrationally putting a political microscope on Israel.

Her gal-pal Hillary Clinton is another fixated on the Israel construction industry as if it's a threat to world peace, Middle East peace, Judea and Samaria peace and throw in peace in East and West Jerusalem. 

This is the same Secretary of State whose cheery homilies about settling the endless Syrian massacres are about as useless as used toilet tissue. And don't even ask us about her boss, Obama. His interest in Syria is about as intense as his concern over the outcome of the North Dakota youth table tennis championships.

Of course, Clinton and Obama would widen their attention and concern if the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper pulled a Nasrallah and threatened Washington with rocketry extinction. Nor would Barack The Beautiful react with joy if Mexico declared its peace treaty with Uncle Sam as null and void.

As the endless bloodshed in Syria proves, neither the White House nor the European Union, nor the UN nor any other world body has the backbone to successfully intercede.

But when it comes to what Ashton, Clinton and Obama call "settlement building," that's when they get their political bowels in an uproar. 

Victor Davis Hanson, author of "The End of Sparta," and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, fingers the problem as well as anyone.

"In the world of a narcissistic Barack Obama," says Hanson, "rhetoric need not translate into reality."

Ditto for Baroness Ashton and the one who hopes to be the first female president. 

All three confuse the threat of home-building with the horror of exploding rockets!

This much is certain, when it comes to Israel's well-being, "saichel" they don't have!


By Simon Fischler

Israel has just celebrated her Sixty-fourth birthday and now the Palestinians are doing what they do best: expressing their racist hatred of Jews and the Jewish nation/state.

The Palestinians do this annually by taking to the streets of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza strip in memory of what? The Catastrophe. This is what the Palestinians call the Creation of the Jewish democratic state, when we freed ourselves from the oppression of colonial European and Muslim Arab hegemony.

Israeli Memorial Day centers on remembering the children of Israel who have been killed fighting in her defense. Palestinian Memorial Day (the Nakba) is built on Palestinian Arabs anger and frustration that they were not able to destroy and annihilate the Jews when we fought for our independence. Our FREEDOM is a TRAGEDY to the Palestinians.

In more precise words, the premise of the Nakba is nothing but racist, anti-Semitic fervor. The Palestinians have built the myth of the nation they allegedly seek on scandalous lies.

Instead of taking responsibility for rejecting the legal UN partition of the land then called the Palestine Mandate (controlled by the British Empire) into an Arab and Jewish state, the Palestinians simply blame the nation they attacked and to which they lost.

This is the root of why peace has never been achieved -- not settlements in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank today).

Palestinian Negotiator Saeb Erekat writes in Haaretz that Israel has a choice between Peace or Apartheid.

Mr. Erekat apparently has forgotten his own earlier words wherein he promised the Palestinian people that not a single Jew would be allowed to live in the state of Palestine. He also conveniently forgets to mention that any citizen living in the Palestinian Authority TODAY who sells land to a Jew can receive the death penalty.

In his arrogant tone Mr. Erekat speaks of “Palestinian reconciliation and the Arab spring,” which merely indicates that he knows how to tell a joke, albeit a sick and twisted one.

Fatah has just made a deal with the devil (Hamas in Gaza) and no matter how much Saeb Erekat tries to spin this for the Western world, a deal with the Devil is still a deal with the Devil.

Hamas does not and will not recognize Israel. Hamas has promised never to accept Israel or the Jewish Nation’s right to freedom in the land of their ancestors.

Israel will not, I repeat WILL NOT sign any peace deal that does not recognize Israel as the Jewish democratic state and create an end to the conflict between the two nations.

The deal that Fatah signed with Hamas guarantees that this is impossible.

Mr. Erekat continues his venomous lies by saying that “the Palestinian Authority has been ready to negotiate with ALL Israeli governments.” This statement points once again to the root problem of the conflict between the Palestinians and Israel: there are the facts and then there are the lies that the Palestinians build and live off of.

Seriously, how can Saeb Erekat even say something as ridiculous as this and get away with it? 

The Palestinian Authority has rejected negotiations with Israel for the last two and a half years; absolutely, ABSOLUTELY refusing to negotiate with the Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu.

They have done nothing but create excuses not to negotiate, again and again spewing preconditions for negotiations -- something that has NEVER BEEN DONE previously.

This smoke screen is nothing more than the Palestinians’ attempt to do what they have always tried to do: destroy Israel.

Sadly, the Palestinians seem incapable of realizing that as long as they see Israel as a “catastrophe” and continue to seek her destruction, their nation will fail.

It makes no difference if a dictator in Venezuela, Syria or Turkey recognizes a Palestinian State. If that state does not negotiate and make peace with Israel, she will ultimately realize what “catastrophe” truly is, rendering the birth of Israel 64 years ago a minor glitch in their made-up history of woe.

The Palestinians need to wake up, once and for all, to reality. 

Their threatened one-state declaration is the political equivalent of a previous obscene method of trying to destroy Israel: suicide bombings. 

Only this time they will well and truly blow themselves up.

By the time the Palestinian leaders go again to the UN to make their threatened unilateral declaration, Israel will have unilaterally annexed all the land in Judea and Samaria that she wants, -- not needs, but wants -- into her borders. 

The Palestinians will end up with far less than the 93 to 97 percent offered to them by Ehud Barak and then Ehud Olmert that they rejected.

Israel will then affectively shut the Palestinians out of her borders completely. 

The ONE State created will be Jordan and Palestine, not Israel and Palestine. 

If anyone should be scared, it is the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. It is also why Jordanian authorities are illegally stripping their Palestinian population (a majority of the population) -- of Jordanian citizenship.

Israel fights for her freedom; not to oppress. Israel has continually shown she is ready to accept a Palestine when that people is ready to accept Israel for what she is: the Jewish nation/state.

The Palestinians fight to conquer, oppress and annihilate one entity: Israel. 

They do not fight for freedom; and never have. If they truly did, they could have had it years ago.

The Palestinians’ national and political movement is based solely on destroying Jewish freedom, self-determination and the national home of the Jews, Israel; not on creating a state of their own. 

It is the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians who are the racists, who advocate a colonialist Arab take-over of an eighty percent Jewish State.

Nakba Day is nothing more than a Palestinian expression of this racist, anti-Semitic mentality. 

We Israelis should be out in force to counter-protest this detestable day of Palestinian colonialism.


Sunday, May 13, 2012


We hit it like that and we did like that!

It'll take a world of trillions to hold Israel back!

For Israel it has always been survival of the fittest!

Die Zion, die Zion, your too Jew; never Israel is too strong.

Never will we bow!

In the 21st. century, we take back what is ours!

Leave it up to Israel to be living proof, and kick the truth to the young Jewish youth!

Don't forget Arab's be living strife, and Israel always needs to be ready to strike!

Nashrallah talks cheap from a bunker, while we fly high like eagles in the sky!

Enough of the ghetto, the word we invented, Israel rises like the Lion of Judah!


Thursday, May 10, 2012


By Simon Fischler

Today there is a movement to delegitimize the state of Israel, brand it an apartheid nation and force upon it a one-state solution.

The people behind this movement are sophisticated in their propaganda and malicious in their intent.

A large part of this anti-Israel and anti-Semitic group happen to be Israeli Arabs. Their attempts to force upon the MAJORITY of Israeli citizens the fabrication and revision of history called the Nakbah is unacceptable! 

Israel is both the Jewish nation and a democratic state at the same time (the only democracy in the entire Middle East). All of her citizens have the right to vote -- Israeli Arabs, Bedouin, Druze and Circassians included.

The Arab Muslim population of Israel has far more rights than in any other country in the entire Arab/Muslim world, this is an indisputable fact. 

There are thirteen Arab and five Druze members in the Knesset. In Apartheid South Africa black Africans were not allowed to vote at all.

The Arab Israeli population is free to live, work and play where they want in Israel. 

The fact that most Israeli Arabs elect to live in discreetly separate villages is a matter more of historical, cultural, tribal and/or religious choice, but under Israeli law, they are legally free to live anywhere. 

Some do, and in the Lebanon conflict of 2006, Israeli Arabs were bombed – in Haifa and in many outlying villages and orchards in the North, which is heavily populated with Druze, Circassians and Israeli Arabs of so-called “Palestinian” descent.

Israeli Arabs can marry Jewish Israelis. In Apartheid South Africa black Africans were not allowed to go to white beaches. They were not allowed to use white public bathrooms and most certainly were not allowed to marry whites. They were not allowed to drink from white water fountains, etc. The black South Africans were totally segregated from the white community by law.

The Occupied Territories-

In the occupied territories the Palestinian population has the right to vote for their own government and leaders, and have twice. This cannot be done in Kurdistan, Tibet, Turkish Occupied Northern Cyprus and of course for the Basques in Spain and France.  

However, much to the vocal dismay of some misled, left-leaning activists the Palestinian population cannot move about and live their lives as freely as they had in the past.

Why is that?

In 2000, at the Taba negotiations Yasser Arafat was offered full peace, including a Palestinian State on 95-97% of the land of Judea and Shomron (or the West-bank as it is wrongfully called by many today), Arab sections of East Jerusalem, the Muslim and Christian quarters of the Old City and all of Gaza.

Yassar Arafat turned this offer of peace down; Arafat turned down the formation of the Palestinian State. 


He did this because he wanted everything, not just Palestine: he wanted Israel too.

He insisted that Israel accept the unacceptable: the illegal right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees to Israel. 

The idea of Israel taking responsibility for a war started by the Arab population of Mandate Palestine and the neighboring Arab states is totally insane. 

The “refugees” created by this war can be attributed mostly to the Arab nations that started it. It is a known fact, admitted by many Arabs of the time, that they urged the Arab population of Palestine to flee. Here are some quotes.

ON SEPTEMBER 6, 1948, the Beirut Daily Telegraph quoted Emil Ghory, secretary of the Arab Higher Committee (AHC), as saying: "The fact that there are those refugees is the direct consequence of the action of the Arab states in opposing partition and the Jewish state. The Arab states agreed upon this policy unanimously..."

ON APRIL 23, 1948 Jamal Husseini, acting chairman of the Palestine AHC told the UN Security Council, "The Arabs did not want to submit to a truce ... They preferred to abandon their homes, belongings and everything they possessed."

IN THE MARCH 1976 issue of Falastin a-Thaura, then the official journal of the Beirut-based PLO, Mahmud Abbas ("Abu Mazen", now Prime Minister of the West Bank PA), then a PLO spokesman, wrote: "The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live."

ON APRIL 9, 1953, the Jordanian daily al-Urdun quoted a refugee, Yunes Ahmed Assad, formerly of Deir Yassin, as saying: "For the flight and fall of the other villages, it is our leaders who are responsible, because of the dissemination of rumours exaggerating Jewish crimes and describing them as atrocities in order to inflame the Arabs ... they instilled fear and terror into the hearts of the Arabs of Palestine until they fled, leaving their homes and property to the enemy."
These are but a few examples of Arab and Palestinians who attested to the fact that the majority of the Arabs fled the new state of Israel because they were told to by their leaders.

There were definitely situations where the newly formed IDF entered and pushed out Arab communities, but in most cases this was a small proportion. With few exceptions, most of these situations were caused by local Arab populations giving refuge to Arab fighters who were attacking Jewish communities, rendering them viable military targets. 

What you also do not hear about are the atrocities committed by the arabs against Jewish communities during the Israeli War of Independence.

In fact there were more Jewish refugees created after the Israeli War of Independence when they were robbed of all their lands and possessions and thrown out of Arab countries. There were a total of 900,000 Jewish refugees from Arab countries, compared to 700,000 Arab refugees.

We do not hear about the Jewish refugees today because Israel, unlike surrounding Arab nations and North African Muslim countries, opted to follow the UN partition and managed to win its independence in a brutal war that cost her 5% of her population. 

Instead of using Jewish refugees from Arab countries as political pawns Israel settled these refugees. Sadly of course the same cannot be said about what the Arab's have done to their supposed Palestinian brothers; keeping them in refugee camps and denying them rights.

One must also remember that neither Jordan nor Egypt allowed the Palestinians, whose areas they were occupying, their independence. 

Jordan occupied the West Bank and East Jerusalem (razing the entire Jewish quarter of the Old City during the War of Independence); Egypt the Gaza strip. 

They easily could have given the Palestinians their independence. In both cases it was easier to keep these supposed Arab brethren locked up in refugee camps, fomenting hate and creating another generation to fight and kill Jews.

Why would the Palestinian leadership want to have their refugees settle in a state that is not theirs? Why wouldn’t they want to settle their refugees in their newly formed state? 

The only reason for this policy is the unquestionably bigoted and monomaniacal intent to destroy the state of Israel; to wipe out the Jews.
The Hope of the Left, the One State solution and why it is Racist

The idea of a one-state solution would be a great idea if it meant Israel kept all of her settlements bordering the Green Line, while the Palestinians formed a confederated state with Jordan. 

This is the only one state solution that will ever happen! 

Any other version of a "one-state solution" is considerably less than unacceptable.

The concept that Arabs or Muslims can have as many states as they wish, but the Jews cannot have one state for themselves, is not just old-school anti-Semitism, it is pure racism. 

The majority of Israel is Jewish -- 80% Jewish; not South Africa where whites constituted barely 10% of the population.

The mentality and policies of the Radical left, Radical right, Anarchists, self-defined “human rights activists” and their comrades is one of racism/anti-Semitism, although they would no doubt vociferously deny this reality. 

Why would the Europeans, especially many of the left in Europe, be so pro-independence for a nation like Kosovo and be so strongly against Israel’s self-determination? 

After all Kosovo has always been part of Serbia.

Why is it right for the Palestinians to have a state, but not right for the Jewish nation? 

Why is it that a “nation” or people that has been living and connected to this land centuries before there was a conquered land called “Palestine” (named so by a Roman emperor trying to erase an earlier state of Israel) or a prophet called Mohammad? 

The only reason is racist/anti-Semitic sentiment.

In truth, it is the Arabs who have executed or proposed policies towards Israel that are far closer to segregation and apartheid. 

To this day most Arab states behave as if Israel does not exist. 

Most maps found in the Arab world do not have Israel on them. To this day, textbooks in Arab countries and the Palestinian territories either omit Israel, as if it doesn’t exist, or actively describe Israel as an illegal, usurping enemy to be destroyed.

Under any peace agreement supposedly proposed by Palestinian leaders and/or supporters, Israel would have to remove all Jews from the West Bank. 

Is that not segregation and/or apartheid? 

In Jordan, Jews cannot buy land, which is worse than segregation.

As of 2004 the Saudi Arabian tourism website listed 4 groups of people who would not be granted entry visas:
• Israelis and anyone with a passport “that has an Israeli arrival/departure stamp.”
• Those who don’t abide by Saudi traditions, and those under the influence of alcohol.
• Non-Muslims intending to go to Mecca or Medina, where non-Muslims are banned.
• “Jewish people.”

It is one thing to deny Israelis, but to deny those who have traveled to Israel or to deny any Jew is bigoted, racist and anti-semitic!

Thus, those who rally for the One-State solution are either wolves in sheep’s clothing or ignorant fools; both equally dangerous, at least for the state of Israel and peace based on equality. 

The One-State solution has also been proven totally unworkable in the rest of the world, the former Yugoslavia being a prime example. Those who wish to see this happen must truly want to see the Jews driven out of their land again, as the Arabs have promised often.

The Separation Fence-

The separation fence Israel has been forced to build has become the great fallacy of the Radical Left. 

Before Arafat and his Palestinians decided against peace and statehood in 2000 and opted for war, there was no barrier. The barrier wasn’t started until the June 16, 2002, two years after Arafat turned his back on peace and instituted Arafat’s War (mistakenly known as the “second intifada”). 

Israel only began to build this barrier after five suicide bombings in Israel and 91 Israeli deaths. There were many more suicide bombings carried out until the completion of the barrier. Since its completion there have been none!

Most importantly, had the Palestinians opted for peace, the barrier would never have been built. What the Barrier has brought is relative calm, for both Israel and the Palestinians of the West Bank. 

Israel has been able to turn over cities and land back to the Palestinian Authority and has taken down some checkpoints. The economy of the Palestinian Authority controlled West Bank has improved since the end of suicide attacks. All of this points to positive attributes of the Barrier.

America has built a partial barrier on the border of Mexico; Saudi Arabia on its border with Yemen; the EU in the Spanish enclave of Ceuta bordering Morocco and India along its border with Pakistan. 

Why should Israel not have the right to build a border fence to protect its citizens, not only to keep out illegal immigrants, but would-be murderers and terrorists?

It is absolutely essential that the government of Israel recognize the genuine danger it now faces from those trying to “delegitimize” it with deliberate, malicious deceit. It must dedicate government money, combine her intelligence forces with grassroots supporters fighting on the verbal “front line” and treat this insidious campaign as an existential threat.

In short, Israel -- and its allies -- must do all they can NOW to expose the Jew-hating elements trying to destroy it.

Monday, May 7, 2012


By Schmoel Yitzhak


Wake up to reality, my good friends. 

No such treaty can be written -- whether it be on parchment, in concrete or etched on a stained-glass window -- that will guarantee permanent peace for Jews in Israel.

Oh, sure, you may be able to hammer out a deal that SAYS Arabs will be nicey-nice to The Jewish State and the deal may even have the permanency of mayonnaise or a long-lasting bagel; but not likely more than that.

And if you want proof-positive, merely consult your daily paper, handy television set or -- as electronics would have it -- that magical thing you carry in your hand all the time bringing you the latest news.

As for the news, I'm referring to a couple of stories, one of which the New York Times'  journalistic stooge, Haaretz, recently headlined: THOUSANDS IN JORDAN CALL FOR END OF PEACE TREATY WITH ISRAEL.

Don't for a second believe that the Jordanians are kidding around. Last Friday protesters numbering in the thousands crowded streets in no less than seven Jordanian cities urging authorities to expel the Israeli ambassador from Amman.

To show that they mean business, the Jew-hating Arabs burned Israeli flags, chanted "death, death to Israel" and "no to a Zionist embassy on our land."

Should this combined -- Islamic-leftist -- malicious jubilee sound familiar to you, it certainly should because similar demonstrations have taken place in Egypt. 

So, what does all this prove?

For starters we know that Egypt and Jordan have -- for what they are worth -- peace treaties with Israel. The late Anwar Sadat signed the Egyptian pact with Israel's Menachem Begin while the late King Hussein was architect of the Jordanian deal. Each was penned at a more optimistic time in the Middle East before militant Islam set out to more forcefully conquer the area. 

The anti-Mubarak uprising has changed all that. Although the Egyptian government is in a state of flux -- by the way, do you know who's running the country? -- it has become apparent that the nation's Muslim Brotherhood has become its power broker. Furthermore, the MB says NG -- translated NO GOOD -- to virtually anything Israeli. 

That helps explain why the gas pipeline between Egypt and Israel has suffered more Islamic-inflicted holes than a decade's worth of Swiss cheese and that Egypt has virtually declared that Benjamin Netanyahu had better find another fuel source because that pipeline ain't for Jews anymore.  

No question;  at best, Israel's peace treaty with Cairo is hanging by a gossamer string. At worst, it will be severed the moment that the MB takes over -- a la Hamas in Gaza -- and decides that it wants to once and for all take on Israel in a war.

As for the Jordanians, after the present King Abdullah's father signed the Israel-Jordan peace pact in 1994 at Wadi Araba, a period of relative calm and mutual understanding -- if not respect -- prevailed between the neighbors. 

What's more the contemporary King Abdullah has done as much as any Arab leader to maintain Arab-Israeli decorum from his side of the fence. The monarch recently proved that yet again when he nominated Prime Minister Fayez Tarawneh who once served as a key figure in the 1994 Jordan-Israel peace process. 

Courageously, Tarawneh indicated that, given the opportunity to do it all over again, he would support the 1994 peace treaty. 

Trouble is that Tarawneh's position has aroused the Jordanian MB's ire -- not to mention the leftists' mob -- and that inspires the realistic question: what would happen if the MB took over Jordan the way it's now doing in Egypt? 

Clearly, the answer would be that the peace treaty with Israel would become an endangered species.

It also proves one point that the naive Obama, Clinton, et. al. neglect to note; until the surrounding Arab states unequivocally recognize Israel as THE Jewish State and, furthermore,  guarantee its right to exist, the do-gooders treaty-mongering will be as useful as flat wheels on the Peace Express!

Saturday, May 5, 2012


By Simon Fischler

Imagine how different the United States would be today if George Washington had altered his first inaugural address to read as follows: 

"Fellow Americans; now that our country is established we no longer need the core values that pushed our citizens to fight for freedom and create this country."

That would not have been approved by the patriots who created the good, old USA, would it? Not by a long shot!

Yet that is the kind of message post-Zionists have been delivering both in and out of Israel.

Although the Zionist concept dates back to the destruction of the Second Temple and the exile of a large population of Jews from Israel, the Jewish democratic State of Israel is only sixty-four years old.

Imagine, also, if a later American president named Abraham Lincoln stood up at Gettsyburg, Pennsylvania and delivered the following words: 

"Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

"Now we have a minority in our country that dislike these great values. And since they do not like them I have taken it upon myself to scrap all that was great about this nation for 'Post-Americanism.' Thank you very much and have a pleasant day."

Guaranteed, that message would not have resonated very well with the soldiers fighting and dying to make America right and to carry on the greatness of the nation during its Civil War.

Could you possibly imagine a member of either the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives campaigning on the premise that the Constitution and Declaration of Independence were garbage documents, so to speak, and that they should be chucked into the dustbin of history? Of course you could not because it never would happen in the good, old USA.

Yet, Post-Zionists are trying to do the same subversive, seditious things in Israel. 

Post-Zionism is an elitist mentality and its adherents want to deprive the common Israeli of his self-determination. Post-Zionism epitomizes the arrogance of the left.

It is vital to remember that just because the Jewish Nation State has been created it does not mean that it can rest on its laurels. We have not completed the project we have forged as a national crusade in 1948. We must fight for our freedom against Arab fascists who wish to duplicate the Jewish nightmare created by Adolf Hitler.

More than ever we need the great principles of Zionism.

Those who tell us otherwise are not at all interested in what is right for our people or our nation.

Friday, May 4, 2012


By Simon Fischler 
While walking my dogs, as the sun rose in the east, I heard the unmistakable whoop of helicopter blades cutting through the air. 
As I looked up, I saw four Israeli Air Force Blackhawk helicopters flying at tree level towards Lebanon. 
Mind you, where I live in El Rom we are less than two miles from the Syrian border. 
As they flew past me I could see the soldiers inside, that is how low they were flying. 
What an amazing feeling, knowing that the sons and daughters of my fellow citizens, members of a citizen army were flying off to protect me, my family, my neighbors and my fellow Israeli’s.
As Hezbollah skulks behind Lebanese citizens like roaches, the children of Israel fly high in the sky like the Eagles of the west. 
Hamas too hides behind phony, colonial, human rights activists and the citizens of Gaza; like snakes in the grass. On the other hand our boys and girls stand in front of our citizens to protect them; like lions of Judah!
The boys and girls of the IDF go out of their way to protect even those who wish harm upon their country and nation. While Assad and the Syrian army cower, fight, murder and commit genocide against their own citizens who demand freedom. 
The boys and girls of the IDF fight to protect those who love liberal, democratic values. 
Do you? 

When I saw those helicopters passing over, carrying our boys, I knew at that moment the foolishness behind post-Zionism. As I looked up in the sky I saw the children of my co-patriots flying by, off to protect our nation. 

There they were, still putting their lives on the line, even after sixty four years  of fighting the Arab colonialist aspirations to destroy Jewish freedom and self-determination. 

When I saw our boys and girls fly by, I saw the folly in every Uncle Tom Jew and Israeli that try so hard too make us think badly of our great nation and the boys and girls who fight for it. 
Yes, this morning I was so thankful to see my boys and girls, the children of Zionism, the future of the Jewish Nation flying off to look after our great nation. 
This morning it was a blessing to see the BLACKHAWKS OF DAWN!